The Struggle of Film Adaptations

 By Ava Walter, 12th grade

Adapting books to film can be a complex task, and filmmakers often have difficulty fully capturing the spirit of a narrative. One initial reason film adaptations often struggle to match the quality of a book is due to the significant differences between the two forms. Books can use an abundance of details and internal monologue to convey meaning, whereas films have a time constraint and engage the audience mostly through visuals
.

In a narrative and literary context, readers can expose themselves to the character's thoughts, feelings, and motivations in ways that create a more in-depth sense of the characters' inner lives. This character portrayal promotes a stronger emotional connection to the characters, supporting reader empathy for both character struggles and triumphs. Films depict character development mostly through dialogue and visual clues, and usually refrain from internal thinking and dialogue. The process of visualizing characters' struggles may ignore key internal conflicts; the result is often character development that seems less developed and relatable compared to these developments in books.

Stories depicted in narrative forms also often have the ability to create complex plots and subplots that can be easily conveyed. It seems to be easier for book writers to create stories where they can spend time developing themes and weaving threads of varying characters in the story. Movies, on the other hand, typically have a limit they have to work with and they often have to omit large sections of significant plots, characters, and themes in order to satisfy time constraints. The meaning and richness that readers appreciated in texts may be lost in films due to the shortening or omission of scenes, plots, or characters.

In addition to the issue of time, the visual representation of a book also presents its own problems. A book's imagery, particularly a fictional work, is interpreted by the reader in a largely subjective manner. Books allow readers to provide their own mental images of characters, locations, and events, because these images rely heavily on the author's writing and the perception of the reader. In the form of a film, images rely heavily on the director's perspective and the production team. Differences in images produced by filmmakers versus images produced by readers could stimulate disappointment in fans of the source material, as their conceived version of the events may differ from the presented film.

Furthermore, the process of filmmaking is often collaborative, which adds various creative influences that alter the story. The screenwriter provides their own interpretations, directors provide another layer interpretation, and actors may live out their own interpretations of the characters. While these presentations have the potential to produce creative interpretation, they have the potential to stray from the intent of the original story.

Truly successful film adaptations of written texts may be hard to accomplish due to differences in form, time, visual representation, and collaboration. While some adaptations may

be successful in relaying the intent of the original work, many adaptations leave audiences missing the book's intricacies that make the story what it is.